|
Projected Tourist Revenues from a Clothing-Optional Beach at Ft De Soto County Park
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derived from attendance at Haulover Beach, North Miami, FL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected attendance at a CO beach at Ft De Soto as a percentage of attendance at Haulover Beach
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From the Year 2000 Census figures
|
|
|
From Visit Florida, Inc
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSA* for Miami, Ft Lauderdale
|
3,876,380
|
|
1997 visitors to southeast Florida
|
15,417,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSA for Tampa, St Petersburg, Clearwater
|
2,395,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSA for Sarasota, Bradenton
|
589,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for Tampa Bay area
|
2,985,956
|
|
1997 visitors to central west Florida
|
8,297,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tampa Bay area as a % of Miami/Ft Laud
|
77%
|
|
|
|
|
54%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since approximately 35% of attendance at Haulover Beach is local and 65% is from outside the area, the above
|
|
|
|
percentages can be proportionallly combined to come up with an overall percentage to use in predicting
|
|
|
|
attendance at a CO beach at Ft De Soto as compared to attendance figures at Haulover Beach.
|
|
62%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual attendance at Haulover Beach
|
|
|
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected attendance figures for a clothing-optional beach at Ft De Soto, using 62% of Haulover Beach figures.
|
745,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected Tourist Revenues based on clothing-optional Beach attendance and daily expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since 65% of attendance at Haulover Beach is from outside their local MSA, assuming the same percentage
|
|
|
|
for a clothing-optional beach at Ft De Soto, the projected tourist attendance would be -
|
|
|
485,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed tourist spending per day
|
|
$50
|
|
$100
|
|
$180
|
|
|
|
Projected Tourist Revenue
|
|
$24 million
|
|
$48 million
|
|
$87 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion: The first two assumed daily expenditures are very conservative. None of the above figures take into account the
|
|
|
multiplier effect of dollars spent in the local economy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* MSA - Metropolitan Survey Area
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|